inspector who scrutiny florida appeared good

#Inspector who scrutiny florida appeared good update#

It found that $3.9 billion in state dollars and $3.4 billion in federal dollars flowed into 839 organizations that have sole-source, public-private agreements with a state agency. The extensive review, conducted over 10 months by Miguel’s team, offered a window into the lucrative nature of the state’s 20-year push to privatize state services. Only after DeSantis came to office and then DCF-Secretary Chad Poppell started demanding that FCADV turn over documents to agency auditors, did details emerge about the extent of the excessive compensation going to that organization.Īfter months of obfuscation, FCADV turned over documents, revealing for the first time that it paid Carr more than $7.5 million from state and federal funds - including nearly $5 million in cash compensation for “paid time off.” In July 2018, the Miami Herald first reported that six years after Scott started raising questions, Carr, the CEO of the domestic violence coalition, was receiving an annual salary of more than $761,000, which included questionable bonuses and compensation packages.

#Inspector who scrutiny florida appeared good update#

Only in 2017, when Scott proposed a sweeping update to child welfare statutes did lawmakers adopt a cap on the amount of money executives could make: no more than 150% of what the secretary of DCF makes, which would translate to $213,819.īut legislators continued to overlook the issue. Her office, working with the agency inspectors general, were “continuing their review of the entities that were either in non-compliance or appeared to have excessive compensation or are requested by the agency for further review.” However, nothing within the document is final,’' she wrote. “Just to be clear, the intent for the CIG’s preliminary report is to show where we may receive a request for further review or verification. Miguel attempted to assure lawmakers that the findings were just the first part of a more lengthy look into “excessive” compensation for executives who run private social welfare organizations contracted by the state to manage millions of dollars in state and federal funds.Ī week before, she had sent a letter to executives of the organizations reminding them that the findings were preliminary. Other suggested it was harming their fundraising ability as donors raised doubts about the management of the money. Some suggested that the preliminary findings threatened their nonprofit status with the IRS. Although the information provided to DCF all came from the private organizations themselves and was based on a questionnaire developed by the Office of Inspector General, several of the organizations challenged the conclusions of the report and mounted a public-relations campaign to counter it.